🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.